The Brazilian Supreme Court and the Incoherence Interpretative
the Case of Breach of Bank Secrecy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-42-14Keywords:
bank secrecy, right of privacy, interpretation, coherenceAbstract
The present article aims at critically analyzing the interpretation given by the Brazilian Supreme Court to article 5, item XII of the Brazilian Constitution, which deals with the right to bank secrecy and the exceptional permission that this confidentiality be breached by judicial decision. From the point of view of Tax Law, in 2016, the Brazilian Supreme Court, in the judgment of the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality n. 2.386, eased the referred right to bank secrecy and understood as constitutional the Federal Revenue access to these data without judicial decision for tax inspection purposes. From the point of view of criminal law, however, in a recent monocratic decision of Minister Dias Toffoli in Extraordinary Appeal n. 1.055.941, the suspension of all criminal proceedings pending in Brazil in which bank data was shared without judicial authorization was determined. The object of this article, therefore, is the interpretative divergence of the Federal Supreme Court regarding the same provision and the analysis of its consequences.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martha Toribio Leão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.