Brazilian Superior Court of Appeals and the Single Tax Principle

Authors

  • Roberto Codorniz Leite Pereira Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (FDUSP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n10-6

Keywords:

single tax principle, Brazilian Superior Court of Appeals, hybrid mismatches, double non-taxation, tax avoidance, tax arbitrage

Abstract

The aim to pursue the single tax principle has dominated the agenda of the international community since the release of the reports addressing the action plans to target base erosion and profit shifting (the “BEPS Project”). The single tax principle is not a new issue in the international tax debate. Since the debates prior to the release of the first model tax conventions on income and capital, the aim to tax the income neither more nor less than once has been advocated as an ideal state of affairs. Recently, the Brazilian Judicial Courts issued a precedent providing that the application of double taxation conventions was conditioned upon the demonstration by taxpayers of the absence of hybrid mismatches leading to double non taxation. This article argues that such precedent is to be criticized firstly because it ignores the rules of Public International Law governing both the creation of rights and obligations among States and the interpretation of international conventions. Moreover, the precedent must also be criticized from the perspective of the legal uncertainty raised. Furthermore, this article argues that in case there is an international convention providing for the exchange of information for tax purposes on request and mutual agreement procedure, it is the Tax Administration that shall be in charged of requesting the information necessary to certify that there is no double non taxation outcome.

Author Biography

Roberto Codorniz Leite Pereira, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (FDUSP)

Doutor em Direito Econômico, Financeiro e Tributário pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo (FDUSP). Master of Laws (LL.M.) em Direito Tributário Internacional (International Tax Law) pela Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (WU). Mestre em Direito e Desenvolvimento pela Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV DIREITO SP). Pós-graduado em Direito Tributário pelo Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa (INSPER-SP). Graduado em Direito pela Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV DIREITO SP). Associado ao IBDT. Professor dos cursos de pós-graduação do IBDT. Advogado em São Paulo.

References

Referências bibliográficas

 Artigos acadêmicos e livros:

AMARAL JÚNIOR, Alberto do. Curso de Direito Internacional Público. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.

AVI-YONAH, Reuven S. International Taxation of Electronic Commerce. In: Tax Law Review, n. 52, 1997.

______. International Tax as International Law. Cambrige University Press, 2007.

ÁVILA, Humberto. Teoria dos princípios: da definição à aplicação dos princípios jurídicos. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2014.

BAKER, Philip. Double Taxation Conventions and International Tax Law. Londres: Sweet & Maxwell, 1994.

BRAUNER, Yariv. What the BEPS? In: Florida Tax Review, v. 16, n. 2, Gainesville: Florida University, 2014.

BRICHAMBAUT, Marc Perrin; DOBELLE, Jean-François; COULÉE, Frédérique. Leçons de Droit International Public. 2. ed. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po et Dalloz, 2011.

BRODZKA, Alicja; GARUFI, Sebastiano. The Era of Exchange of Information and Fiscal Transparency: The Use of Soft Law Instruments and the Enhancement of Good Governance in Tax Matters. In: European Taxation. Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012 (august).

CARRIÓN, Alejandro J. Rodríguez. Lecciones de Derecho Internacional Público. 3. ed. Madrid: Tecnos, 1994.

DAGAN, Tsilly. The Costs of International Tax Cooperation. Michigan Law and Economics Research Paper No. 02-007; and University of Michigan Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13, 2002, p. 21. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=315373 ou http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.315373 (acesso em: 12/10/2021).

DE BROE, Luc; LUTS, Joris. BEPS Action 6: Tax Treaty Abuse. Intertax, v. 43, issue 2, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2015.

DINH, Nguyen Quoc; DAILLIER, Patrick; FORTEAU, Mathias; PELLET, Alain. Droit International Public. 8. ed. Paris: LGDJ, 2009.

DIXON, Martin. Textbook on International Law. 7. ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2013.

DUPUY, Pierre-Marie; KERBRAT, Yann. Droit International Public. Paris: Dalloz, 2016.

GUGGENHEIM, Paul. Traité de Droit International Public. Tome I. 10. ed. revue et augmentée. Genève: Librairie de l’Universté, Georg et Cie SA, 1967.

KALLERGIS, Andréas. La Compétence Fiscale. Paris: Daloz, 2018.

LANG, Michael. BEPS Action 6: Introducing an Antiabuse Rule in Tax Treaties. In: Tax Notes International, v. 74, n. 7. Washington DC: Tax Analysts, maio de 2014.

______. Introduction to the Law of Double Taxation Conventions. Vienna: Linda, 2013.

MASUI, Yoshihiro. Taxation of foreign subsidiaries: Japan’s tax reform 2009/10. Bulletin for International Taxation. Amsterdam, IBFD, v. 64, n. 04, 2010, p. 242-248.

MAZZUOLI, Valério de Oliveira. Algumas questões jurídicas sobre a formação e aplicação do costume internacional. Revista dos Tribunais, v. 921, 2012.

NETO, Luís Flávio; PEREIRA, Roberto Codorniz Leite. Brasil: a Reação ao Abuso no Âmbito dos Acordos de Bitributação em um País sem GAAR que Adota “Principal Purpose Test Clauses”. In: SCHOUERI, Luís Eduardo; NETO, Luís Flávio; SILVEIRA, Rodrigo Maito. Novos Paradigmas da Tributação Internacional e a Covid-19 – Anais – VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Direito Tributário Internacional. São Paulo: IBDT, 2020.

PEREIRA, Roberto Codorniz Leite. Cooperação Fiscal Internacional e Troca de Informações. Série Doutrina Tributária Vol. XXI. São Paulo: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Tributário, 2020.

ROCHA, Sérgio André. Tributação Internacional. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2013.

ROIN, Julie. Competition and Evasion: Another Perspective on International Tax Competition. In: The Georgetown Law Journal, n. 89, 2001.

ROSENBLOOM, David. International Tax Arbitrage and the ‘International Tax System’, The David R. Tillinghast Lecture. In: Tax Law Review, v. 53. New York: New York University, 2000.

ROUSSEAU, Charles. Droit International Public. Tome I: Introduction et Sources. France: Sirey, 1971.

SCHOUERI, Luís Eduardo.O Projeto BEPS: ainda uma Estratégia Militar. In: GOMES, Marcus Lívio; SCHOUERI, Luís Eduardo. A Tributação Internacional na Era Pós-BEPS – Soluções Globais e Peculiaridades de Países em Desenvolvimento. 2ª Edição, Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2019.

______. Planejamento Fiscal através de Acordos de Bitributação: Treaty Shopping. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 1995, p. 115-133.

______. Tax Treaty Override: a Jurisdictional Approach. Intertax, v.42. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2014.

______; GALDINO, Guilherme. Single Taxation as a Policy Goal: Controversial Meaning, Lack of Justification and Unfeasibility. In: WHEELER, Joanna. (Org.). Single Taxation? Amsterdam: IBFD, 2018.

______; PEREIRA, Roberto Codorniz Leite. Governança Fiscal Internacional: entre a Fragmentação e o Déficit de Legitimidade. In: Revista de Direito Internacional Econômico e Tributário, v. 15, n.2, jul-dez, 2020.

______; PEREIRA, Roberto Codorniz Leite. Tributação Internacional e o Direito Interno. In: MARTINS, Ives Gandra da Silva (Org.). Pesquisas Tributárias: Tributação Internacional e o Direito Interno. 1ed.Porto Alegre: Lex Magister, 2018.

SHAW, Malcom N. Direito Internacional. Tradução de Marcelo Brandão Cipolla, Lenita Ananias do Nascimento, Antônio de Oliveira Stte-Câmara. Coordenação e revisão da tradução por Marcelo Brandão Cipolla. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

VALDERRAMA, Irma Mosqueira et al. Tools used by countries to counteract aggressive tax planning in linght of transparency. In: Intertax, v. 46, Issue 2, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2018.

VOGEL, Klaus. Double Tax Treaties and Their Interpretation. International Tax and Business Lawyer, v. 4:1, 1986.

______. On double Taxation Conventions. Deventer: Kluwer Law, 1991.

WARD, David Anthony. Abuse of Tax Treaties. In: Essays on International Taxation in Honor of Sidney I. Roberts. Series on International Taxation, n. 15. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation, 1993.

 Jurisprudência das Cortes Brasileiras:

BRASIL. SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Recurso Especial nº 1.161.467/RS, Rel. Ministro Castro Meira, Segunda Turma, DJe 01/06/2012.

BRASIL. SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Recurso Especial nº 1.759.081-SP. Ministro Relator Mauro Campbell Marques, Segunda Turma, DJe: 18/12/2020.

BRASIL. SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Recurso Especial nº 1.743.319-SP. Ministro Relator Mauro Campbell Marques, Segunda Turma, DJe 15/03/2021.

BRASIL. SUPERIOR TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA. Recurso Especial nº 1.808.614-RJ. Ministro Relator Mauro Campbell Marques, Segunda Turma, DJe 19/03/2021.

 Jurisprudência da Corte de Justiça da União Europeia:

C-436/08 and C-437/08, Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel BetriebsgmbH, Osterreichische Salinen AG v. Finanzamt Linz, Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 10 February 2011.

C-101/05, Skatterverket v. A, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 18 December 2007.

 Relatórios de Organizações Internacionais:

LEAGUE OF NATIONS. Report on Double Taxation submitted to the Financial Committee by Professors Bruins, Eunaudi, Seligman and Sir Josiah Stamp. Document E.F.S.73.F.19. April, 5th 1923.

LEAGUE OF NATIONS. Double Taxation and Tax Evasion: Report and Resolutions submitted by the technical experts to the Financial Committee of the League of Nations. Document F.212. February, 7th 1925.

OECD. Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.

OECD. Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.

OECD. Developing a Multilateral Instrument to Modify Bilateral Tax Treaties, Action 15 – 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.

OECD. Neutralising the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements, Action 2 - 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.

OECD. Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6 - 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.

OECD. Tax Sparing: a Reconsideration. Paris: OECD Publishing, 1997.

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Codorniz Leite Pereira, R. (2022). Brazilian Superior Court of Appeals and the Single Tax Principle. RDTI Atual, (10), 106–138. https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n10-6

Issue

Section

Doutrina Nacional (Double Peer Reviewed)