GAARs as a Principle of International Law

Brazil’s Challenges to comply with BEPS

Authors

  • Paulo Rosenblatt

Keywords:

GAARs, international tax law, BEPS, Brazil

Abstract

GAARs have a long and endless history. In every economic crisis, the loss of revenue brings them back to the table. At present, the debate is centred on the double non-taxation of income by large multinational companies. In this scenario, the OECD formulated the BEPS program, in which Brazil took part, and that recommended for the adoption, by countries and observers, of international tax treaties GAARs, as one of the solutions to the problem. The suggested requirements of this provision are the principle purpose, of substance or substantial activity, and the object and purpose of the legislation. There was no innovation in this field because they are known elements of some existing GAARs. Brazil’s challenge in following this OECD recommendation, even with a restricted network of treaties, is to reconcile it with the sole paragraph of Article 116 of the National Tax Code.

References

ARNOLD, Brian. The Canadian experience with a general anti-avoidance rule. In: Judith Freedman (ed.). Beyond boundaries: developing approaches to tax avoidance and tax risk management. Oxford: Centre for Business Taxaton, 2008.

BAKER, Philip. Is there a cure for BEPS? Editorial, British Tax Review n. 5, 2013.

_____. The BEPS project: disclosure of aggressive tax planning. Intertax v. 43, n. 1, 2015.

_____. Tax avoidance, tax evasion & tax mitigation. Gray’s Inn Tax Chambers Review. Disponível em: <http://www.taxbar.com/documents/Tax_Avoidance_Tax_MitigationPhilip_Baker.pdf>. Acesso em: 8 mar. 2011.

BRAUNER, Yariv. BEPS, an interim evaluation. World Tax Journal, IBFD, fev., 2014.

CALIENDO, Paulo. Artigos 113 a 118. In: M. M. Peixoto e R. S. M. Lacombe (ed.). Comentários ao Código Tributário Nacional. São Paulo: MP, 2008.

COOPER, Graeme S. The design and structure of general anti-tax avoidance regimes. Bulletin for International Taxation n. 63, v. 1, 2009.

FREEDMAN, Judith. Converging tracks? Recent developments in Canadian and UK approaches to tax avoidance. Canadian Tax Journal n. 53, v. 4, 2005.

_____. Interpreting tax statutes: tax avoidance and the intention of Parliament. Law Quarterly Review n. 123, jan. 2007.

_____. Beyond boundaries: developing approaches to tax avoidance and tax risk management. Oxford: Centre for Business Taxation, 2008.

KREVER, Richard. Chapter 1: general reports: GAARs. In: LANG, Michael (ed.). GAARs – a key element of tax systems in the post-BEPS world. Amsterdã: IBFD, 2016.

LANG, Michael. BEPS Action 6: introducing an antiabuse rule in tax treaties. Tax Notes International v. 74, n. 7, maio 2014.

_____ (org.). GAARs – a key element of tax systems in the post-BEPS world. Prefácio. Amsterdã: IBFD, 2016.

LI, Jinyan. Tax transplant and local culture: a comparative study of the Chinese and Canadian GAAR. Theoretical Inquiries in Law n. 11, 2.

LIEBMAN, Howard M., HEYVAERT, Werner; e OYEN, Valérie. Countering harmful tax practices: BEPS Action 5 and EU initiatives – past progress, current status and prospects. European Taxation, IBFD, fev./mar. 2016.

MICHEL, Bob. Anti-avoidance and tax treaty override: pacta sunt servata? European Taxation, edição especial, IBFD, set. 2013.

MORENO, Andrés Báez. GAARs and treaties: from the guiding principle to the principal purpose test. What have we gained from BEPS Action 6? Intertax v. 45, n. 6 e 7, 2017.

OLIVEIRA, José André Wanderley Dantas de. Intercâmbio de informação como instrumento de preservação do tradicional modelo de tributação internacional. In: José André Wanderley Dantas de Oliveira e Paulo Rosenblatt (org.). Direito tributário – comemoração dos 50 anos do Código Tributário Nacional (estudos em homenagem a Souto Maior Borges). Recife: Nossa Livraria, 2016.

OROW, Nabil. General anti-avoidance rules: a comparative international analysis. Bristol: Jordans, 2000.

PICCIOTTO, Sol. International taxation and economic substance. Bulletin for International Taxation, IBFD, dez. 2016.

ROCHA, Sergio André. Brazil’s international tax policy. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2017.

ROLIM, João Dácio. The general anti-avoidance rule: its expanding role in international taxation. Intertax v. 44, n. 11. Kluwer.

_____; e ROSENBLATT, Paulo. Dez anos da norma geral antielisiva no Brasil. Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário n. 197. São Paulo: Dialética, 2012.

ROSENBLATT, Paulo. General anti-avoidance rules for major developing countries. Roterdam: Kluwer Law International, 2015.

_____. Norma geral antielisiva à brasileira: o art. 116, parágrafo único do CTN. In: Bruno Soeiro Vieira e Frederico Antonio Lima de Oliveira (coord.). Direito tributário: uma homenagem aos 50 anos do CTN. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2016.

_____; e COSTA, Gustavo Cavalcanti. MP 685 criminaliza qualquer forma de planejamento tributário lícito. Disponível em: <https://www.conjur.com.br/2015-set-02/mp-685-criminaliza-qualquer-forma-planejamento-tributario-licito>. Acesso em: 12 out. 2017.

ROOSEVELT, Franklin D. Message to Congress on tax evasion prevention. Washington, 1937.

RIBEIRO, Ricardo Lodi. A elisão fiscal e a LC n. 104/2001. Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário n. 83. São Paulo: Dialética, 2002.

_____. Planejamento fiscal: panorama sete anos depois da LC nº 104/01. Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário n. 159. São Paulo: Dialética, 2008.

SCHOUERI, Luís Eduardo. Os desafios do planejamento tributário. In: Luís Eduardo Schoueri e Rodrigo de Freitas (ed.). Planejamento tributário e o “propósito negocial” – mapeamento de decisões do Conselho de Contribuintes de 2002 a 2008. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2010.

SOUZA, Hamilton Dias de; e FUNARO, Hugo. A insuficiência de densidade normativa da “norma antielisão” (art. 116, parágrafo único, do Código Tributário Nacional). Revista Dialética de Direito Tributário n. 146. São Paulo: Dialética, 2007.

TORRES, Ricardo Lobo. Normas gerais antielisivas. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Administrativo Econômico, 2005. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 31 mar. 2011.

VANISTENDAEL, Frans. Is tax avoidance the same thing under the OECD base erosion and profit shifting action plan, national tax law and EU Law? Bulletin for International Taxation, IBFD, mar. 2016.

ZIMMER, Frederik. IFA general report: form and substance in tax law. Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International v. 87A. IFA, 2002.

Published

2022-01-08

How to Cite

Rosenblatt, P. (2022). GAARs as a Principle of International Law: Brazil’s Challenges to comply with BEPS. RDTI Atual, (2), 232–254. Retrieved from https://revista.ibdt.org.br/index.php/RDTIAtual/article/view/1827

Issue

Section

Artigos