Indirect Taxation and the Single Rate Myth

Authors

  • Martha Toribio Leão Universidade de São Paulo
  • Vanessa Dexheimer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-48-13

Keywords:

Tax reform, Value Added Tax (VAT), single rate, essentiality, non-fiscal objectives of taxation

Abstract

One of the main controversial topics in relation to the Brazilian tax reform is the introduction of a single tax rate for the Goods and Services Tax (IBS in the local acronym), based on the argument that this would be a global trend in countries that introduced a Value Added Tax (VAT). This article will address this topic to demonstrate that the claim of a single tax rate is a myth and not a trend in the countries where the indirect taxation is implemented through a VAT system. On the contrary, a comparative analysis indicates that many countries have around three different rates or, at least, the provision that some supplies of goods and services will be exempt or zero-rated. This article will address the “single rate myth”, the principle that essential goods and services should be treated differently under a consumption tax and that indirect taxes may be used to promote non-fiscal goals.

Author Biographies

Martha Toribio Leão, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutoranda e Mestre em Direito Tributário pela Universidade de São Paulo

Especialista em Direito do Estado e Graduada pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Vanessa Dexheimer

LL.M. em Taxation pela New York University. Mestre em Direito Tributário pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de São Paulo. Graduada em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Advogada em Nova York.

Published

2023-03-21

How to Cite

Leão, M. T., & Dexheimer, V. (2023). Indirect Taxation and the Single Rate Myth. Revista Direito Tributário Atual, (48), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-48-13

Issue

Section

Doutrina Nacional (Double Peer Reviewed)