Indirect Taxation and the Single Rate Myth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-48-13Keywords:
Tax reform, Value Added Tax (VAT), single rate, essentiality, non-fiscal objectives of taxationAbstract
One of the main controversial topics in relation to the Brazilian tax reform is the introduction of a single tax rate for the Goods and Services Tax (IBS in the local acronym), based on the argument that this would be a global trend in countries that introduced a Value Added Tax (VAT). This article will address this topic to demonstrate that the claim of a single tax rate is a myth and not a trend in the countries where the indirect taxation is implemented through a VAT system. On the contrary, a comparative analysis indicates that many countries have around three different rates or, at least, the provision that some supplies of goods and services will be exempt or zero-rated. This article will address the “single rate myth”, the principle that essential goods and services should be treated differently under a consumption tax and that indirect taxes may be used to promote non-fiscal goals.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Martha Toribio Leão, Vanessa Dexheimer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.