LEGAL PRAGMATISM AS AN ARGUMENTATIVE METHOD OF JUSTIFICATION OF THE DECISION MAKING BY THE APPLICATOR OF THE GENERAL ANTIELISIVE LAW
Keywords:
LEGAL PRAGMATISM, ELISION, TAX LAWAbstract
This article aims to use the methodology of legal pragmatism in justifying decision making by the applicator of the anti-elision rule, contained in the paragraph of article 116 of the National Tax Code, especially after the introduction of article 20 in the Law of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law. For this purpose, a bibliographic research was conducted in order to undertake a relationship between the legal-philosophical method proposed by Pragmatism and the meaning and scope of art. 20 of the LINDB and art. 116 from CTN.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Fábio Andrade Martins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.