Starbucks Ruling (Joint Cases T-760/15 e T-636/16)
the Application of the Arm’s Length Principle as a Criterion for Assessing Economic Advantage under European Union State Aid Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-7155-rdtia-n10-4Keywords:
European Union, state aid, individual aids, transfer pricing, arm’s length principle, economic advantageAbstract
This paper addresses the issue of the applicability of the arm’s length principle – as understood by the Commission in the Starbucks case –, as a criterion for assessing the existence of economic advantage of a measure that can constitute State Aid within European Union (EU). It takes into account the fact that the aforementioned principle, as applied by the Commission, is not established in the European legal framework and does not have material substance. Finally, some potential negative consequences deriving from the application of this notion where Member States have national legislation on the matter were briefly presented.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Patricia Correa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.